<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on a constitution for a united, resurgent Sri Lanka</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamilweek.com/news-features/index.php/archives/499/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaamadevan</title>
		<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499/comment-page-1#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaamadevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>Few points...
1. Appreciate Mr. Narendran&#039;s attempt to propose a solution.

2. I do not think there is a poverty of ideas as to what the solutions could be.

3. The devil has always been in the details of implementation.

4. With the country&#039;s democracy strongly based on ethnic rivalry, there is no room for implementaton of any ideas that could even remotely suggest there is an element of compromise in the solution.

5. LTTE&#039;s strategy has always been to destabilise the centers of gravity in the south to the point of implosion of the country.

6. The GoSL (regardless of the leadership) has always been to talk nonsense but act wisely to prevent any form of devolution that could establish a level playing field for the minorities. Earlier, with Tamil moderates, the GoSL thought there would be no consequences if the GoSL chose to abrogate any agreements. But the unforeseen consequences has been militancy which has done so much damage to the country.

So we are in this vicious cycle of violence, each party trying to outsmart the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few points&#8230;<br />
1. Appreciate Mr. Narendran&#8217;s attempt to propose a solution.</p>
<p>2. I do not think there is a poverty of ideas as to what the solutions could be.</p>
<p>3. The devil has always been in the details of implementation.</p>
<p>4. With the country&#8217;s democracy strongly based on ethnic rivalry, there is no room for implementaton of any ideas that could even remotely suggest there is an element of compromise in the solution.</p>
<p>5. LTTE&#8217;s strategy has always been to destabilise the centers of gravity in the south to the point of implosion of the country.</p>
<p>6. The GoSL (regardless of the leadership) has always been to talk nonsense but act wisely to prevent any form of devolution that could establish a level playing field for the minorities. Earlier, with Tamil moderates, the GoSL thought there would be no consequences if the GoSL chose to abrogate any agreements. But the unforeseen consequences has been militancy which has done so much damage to the country.</p>
<p>So we are in this vicious cycle of violence, each party trying to outsmart the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumanasiri Liyanage</title>
		<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499/comment-page-1#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumanasiri Liyanage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>I always read Mr Rajasingham Narendran&#039;s article with lots of interest.  I in fact asked many time publish them in local newspapers and websites.  However, I feel that his constitutional proposals is inadequate to resturucture post-colonial Sri Lankan state to make it an accomadative state.  I am sure his intentions are good.  Any new constitution should be able to reverse two main proesses, namely, centralization and majoritarianism.  As Prof Arthur Lewis once argued majoritarian democracy is not only practical but also immoral in divided societies.  

I think 2000 constitution drfat went beyond Mr Narendran&#039;s proposals.  It was inadequate.  However, with some changes, that draft can be improved.  If all the nations living in Sri Lanka take their current positions as crtisizable positions and begin deliberation without power of coercive force, I still believe that a solution can be found.  

Good to open a discussion among people living in Sri Lanka as well outside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always read Mr Rajasingham Narendran&#8217;s article with lots of interest.  I in fact asked many time publish them in local newspapers and websites.  However, I feel that his constitutional proposals is inadequate to resturucture post-colonial Sri Lankan state to make it an accomadative state.  I am sure his intentions are good.  Any new constitution should be able to reverse two main proesses, namely, centralization and majoritarianism.  As Prof Arthur Lewis once argued majoritarian democracy is not only practical but also immoral in divided societies.  </p>
<p>I think 2000 constitution drfat went beyond Mr Narendran&#8217;s proposals.  It was inadequate.  However, with some changes, that draft can be improved.  If all the nations living in Sri Lanka take their current positions as crtisizable positions and begin deliberation without power of coercive force, I still believe that a solution can be found.  </p>
<p>Good to open a discussion among people living in Sri Lanka as well outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499/comment-page-1#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>The constitution described is almost identical to what&#039;s currently in place.  And this structure perpetuates the disgraceful Sri Lankan oppression of minorities.

Your Tiers 2 &amp; 3 contain meer figureheads to implement decisions reached at Tier 1.  How can this solve the problem?  The fundamental problem in Sri Lanka is the excessive concentration of power at Tier 1 level.

Though I&#039;m not a constitutional lawyer, I have enough common sense to understand that devolution means that most of the functions you have listed under Tier 1 should be devolved down to Tiers 2 and 3.  The more devolution, the better.

For example, your Tier 1 functions include education &amp; resource allocation which have both been deliberately &amp; unashamedly used in decades of Sri Lankan history to marginalise and oppress the Tamil people.  Surely anyone with a genuine desire to solve the problems in Sri Lanka would have in the 1st instance, recommended the devolution of the education &amp; resource allocation portfolios right down to Tier 3 where policy can be tailored to fit the local population.

Please try again to produce a relevant political solution with at least a minimum &amp; finite chance of success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constitution described is almost identical to what&#8217;s currently in place.  And this structure perpetuates the disgraceful Sri Lankan oppression of minorities.</p>
<p>Your Tiers 2 &amp; 3 contain meer figureheads to implement decisions reached at Tier 1.  How can this solve the problem?  The fundamental problem in Sri Lanka is the excessive concentration of power at Tier 1 level.</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;m not a constitutional lawyer, I have enough common sense to understand that devolution means that most of the functions you have listed under Tier 1 should be devolved down to Tiers 2 and 3.  The more devolution, the better.</p>
<p>For example, your Tier 1 functions include education &amp; resource allocation which have both been deliberately &amp; unashamedly used in decades of Sri Lankan history to marginalise and oppress the Tamil people.  Surely anyone with a genuine desire to solve the problems in Sri Lanka would have in the 1st instance, recommended the devolution of the education &amp; resource allocation portfolios right down to Tier 3 where policy can be tailored to fit the local population.</p>
<p>Please try again to produce a relevant political solution with at least a minimum &amp; finite chance of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saraswathy Vageesan</title>
		<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499/comment-page-1#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Saraswathy Vageesan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>Hi Rajasingham

I&#039;m an interesting reader from Christchurch, NZ of your articles after I read your last article where you wrote &quot;LTTE was initially established as a salvation to the tamil but becoming as a monster(to tamils as well as to the whole world community) and soon it will be removed from the tamil people.Your comment was a real accurate one.Some hand whislers(visiladdichchan) may oppose you but your writing was really good and any peace lover will accept those.As you said the so called Ellam is an imaginary and a fake deer.

Saraswathy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rajasingham</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an interesting reader from Christchurch, NZ of your articles after I read your last article where you wrote &#8220;LTTE was initially established as a salvation to the tamil but becoming as a monster(to tamils as well as to the whole world community) and soon it will be removed from the tamil people.Your comment was a real accurate one.Some hand whislers(visiladdichchan) may oppose you but your writing was really good and any peace lover will accept those.As you said the so called Ellam is an imaginary and a fake deer.</p>
<p>Saraswathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.Spencer Melbourne</title>
		<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499/comment-page-1#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.Spencer Melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Simply flabbergasted at your unrealistic expectations and optimism when men who professed that the highest good that a man could perform is to be in the service of his fellowmen but in truth and reality used this preaching mostly as a shield and fought and continue to fight with the sword of personal ambition/family/clan/race and religions benefit/profit and aggrandisement at the expense of less privileged fellow men and women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply flabbergasted at your unrealistic expectations and optimism when men who professed that the highest good that a man could perform is to be in the service of his fellowmen but in truth and reality used this preaching mostly as a shield and fought and continue to fight with the sword of personal ambition/family/clan/race and religions benefit/profit and aggrandisement at the expense of less privileged fellow men and women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m.thiru</title>
		<link>http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499/comment-page-1#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>m.thiru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamilweek.com/news-features/archives/499#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>The bottom line story:
--------------------

Dr.Narendran I presume you are a  cricketer. and you always play a fair game.
I am confused. You mean to say  : 

D.S. Senannayake who had the solid majority &amp; the support of Sanga did not know all what you have written ?

Sir John Kottalaewela ( though did not have the support of the sangha ) did not know all what you have written ?

Oxford  blue SWRD  Bandaranayke ( converted back to Buddhism) who signed  &amp; aborted BC pact  &amp; who had the solid majority and the support of the sangha did not know all what you have written ?

Dudley Senanayake who signed a pact  with F.P represented by Senator Thiruchelvam and lateraborted it, &amp; who had the support of the Sangha did not know all what you have written ?

Srimavo Bandaranayke who had the solid support of the masses and buddhist clergies , Colvin R de Silva ( Trokyst, Consitutional expert, man who roared one language two nation, two language one nation ) and who made democratic Ceylon to a Srilankan Republic, Bhaduidhin  Mohamed the education Minister who represented the Muslims, did not know all what you have written ?

The man who was instrumental in aborting the BC pact, The man who was rejected by Sinhala Buddhists electrorate in Kelaniya and re-elected to Parliament  from Colombo South with substantial Tamil support, the man who boasted and commerated with a postal stamp that he had created a Dhammica Samajaya, and who ignored the democratically elected opposition leader and ingnored the Vaddukodai Resolution and who introduced the Presidential system with a solid majority, the man who was behind the  the 1983 genocide, The Dhammica Nayakya J.R.. Jeyawardne who could not outfox Indira Ghandhi but  outfoxed Rajiv and defended his navy officer who attacked Rajiv, saying he had a sun stroke, did not know all what you have written ?

Premadasa, Cyril Mthew&#039;s team mate, who planned to outfox Rajiv first and Tamils later,did not know all what you have written ?

The  French revolution appreciator,  Vijay Kumarathunge&#039;s partner Chandrika who came with a solid majority and with peace wagon, U-turned with the agenda of war for Peace, did not know all what you have written ?

Ranil Wickrmasinghe who did not have the solid majority yet had the guts to sign a cease fire agreement with a double face ( the ugly face being the international saftey net and with the help of  an Eastern MP made Karuna faction to split from LTTE ) who could implement the CFA and ISGA proposed by the LTTE,did not know all what you have written ?

You mean to say that  Laxman Kadirgamar did not know all what you have written, when he was a minister and advisor to Chandrika ?


Mahinda Rajapakse , the man from Ruhunu  who claimed that he would bring back the SWRD Banda&#039;s  1956 era again with his Chinthanaya, did not know all what you have written ?



What does all the above episodes reveal ? The bottom line is simple. THE QUALITY  OF THE  SINHALA BUDDHIST LEADERSHIP.  Sinhalese Nation in SriLanka needs a  STRONG leader who is honest and capable of implementing just solutions.

For that , Who influence the Sinhalese voters, educated Sinhalese politicians, Buddhist clergies ,  sinhalese owned  &amp; government owned media &amp; so on ? Dr. Narendran do you have the power &amp; control over all these  for your ideas to percolate or permeate to the common man so that they elect a strong leader ? 

On the other hand are you saying that something wrong only with the Tamil leaders after seeing the acts played by the above said sinhalese leaders in the SAD HISTORY OF SRILANKA you have mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line story:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Dr.Narendran I presume you are a  cricketer. and you always play a fair game.<br />
I am confused. You mean to say  : </p>
<p>D.S. Senannayake who had the solid majority &amp; the support of Sanga did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>Sir John Kottalaewela ( though did not have the support of the sangha ) did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>Oxford  blue SWRD  Bandaranayke ( converted back to Buddhism) who signed  &amp; aborted BC pact  &amp; who had the solid majority and the support of the sangha did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>Dudley Senanayake who signed a pact  with F.P represented by Senator Thiruchelvam and lateraborted it, &amp; who had the support of the Sangha did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>Srimavo Bandaranayke who had the solid support of the masses and buddhist clergies , Colvin R de Silva ( Trokyst, Consitutional expert, man who roared one language two nation, two language one nation ) and who made democratic Ceylon to a Srilankan Republic, Bhaduidhin  Mohamed the education Minister who represented the Muslims, did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>The man who was instrumental in aborting the BC pact, The man who was rejected by Sinhala Buddhists electrorate in Kelaniya and re-elected to Parliament  from Colombo South with substantial Tamil support, the man who boasted and commerated with a postal stamp that he had created a Dhammica Samajaya, and who ignored the democratically elected opposition leader and ingnored the Vaddukodai Resolution and who introduced the Presidential system with a solid majority, the man who was behind the  the 1983 genocide, The Dhammica Nayakya J.R.. Jeyawardne who could not outfox Indira Ghandhi but  outfoxed Rajiv and defended his navy officer who attacked Rajiv, saying he had a sun stroke, did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>Premadasa, Cyril Mthew&#8217;s team mate, who planned to outfox Rajiv first and Tamils later,did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>The  French revolution appreciator,  Vijay Kumarathunge&#8217;s partner Chandrika who came with a solid majority and with peace wagon, U-turned with the agenda of war for Peace, did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>Ranil Wickrmasinghe who did not have the solid majority yet had the guts to sign a cease fire agreement with a double face ( the ugly face being the international saftey net and with the help of  an Eastern MP made Karuna faction to split from LTTE ) who could implement the CFA and ISGA proposed by the LTTE,did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>You mean to say that  Laxman Kadirgamar did not know all what you have written, when he was a minister and advisor to Chandrika ?</p>
<p>Mahinda Rajapakse , the man from Ruhunu  who claimed that he would bring back the SWRD Banda&#8217;s  1956 era again with his Chinthanaya, did not know all what you have written ?</p>
<p>What does all the above episodes reveal ? The bottom line is simple. THE QUALITY  OF THE  SINHALA BUDDHIST LEADERSHIP.  Sinhalese Nation in SriLanka needs a  STRONG leader who is honest and capable of implementing just solutions.</p>
<p>For that , Who influence the Sinhalese voters, educated Sinhalese politicians, Buddhist clergies ,  sinhalese owned  &amp; government owned media &amp; so on ? Dr. Narendran do you have the power &amp; control over all these  for your ideas to percolate or permeate to the common man so that they elect a strong leader ? </p>
<p>On the other hand are you saying that something wrong only with the Tamil leaders after seeing the acts played by the above said sinhalese leaders in the SAD HISTORY OF SRILANKA you have mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.583 seconds -->

